©
Charles D. Hayes
The election is over, and the holiday season
offers a chance for us to calm down and attempt to depolarize, as a practical
matter, for the sake of governance. It’s an opportune time to reexamine the notion
of values. In a nutshell, values
means like us. Unless we understand
this at a deep emotional level, we will be ill-prepared for the years ahead,
especially if we are not happy with the election results.
The evidence that we human beings are a
tribal species is irrefutable. When we form groups around beliefs that sometimes
appear to stretch credulity, we adopt an identity that will set us apart from others.
Our differences then give rise to perpetual
anxiety at the mere mention of those who do not share our worldview because, if
we are wrong, then in a deep-seated psychological sense we can't be who we
think we are. This makes us existentially fearful and on the lookout for
scapegoats. Our social history makes this clear beyond doubt.
When the hot-button issues that divide
us become the preoccupation of media in order to gain audience share, the
result is intense demographic polarization. The greatest difficulty in dealing
with these aspects of our behavior is that much of the anxiety and scapegoating
described above plays out in our
subconscious beyond our conscious awareness.
We are not cerebrally wired for equitable
negotiation with people who do not appear to belong to our particular group.
This is why achieving a genuine democracy is so hard and so rare. To judge whether
or not this is true, one need only to look the world over for examples.
The great irony is that if we could simply
get beyond the superficial arguments, accusations, and misunderstandings we
occupy ourselves with politically, we would discover that, fad and fashion
aside, most of the things human beings value on this planet are similar. It’s genuinely
hard to fathom that, as much as we have learned about human behavior in the
past three decades, the world is still fractured by enclaves of people who
believe they are fortunate enough to have grown up with a righteous and
truthful worldview that has escaped practically everybody else.
No matter where we look in America, we
find people who believe that they are the only true possessors of truth, the
only people who really count in the overall scheme of things. And yet, if we
ask to what source their knowledge and special virtue can be attributed, we will find that this truth exists simply
because their particular group wills it so, or because they think they have
found the only true religion or worthy political platform.
The criteria for what constitutes values
are straightforward. We value that which supports and exalts our kind. When we hear the word values in the right context in political
commercials, it rings our identity bell. That's why the term can be used to
nullify or ignore criticism. Values as a euphemism for like us can trump all facts and evidence to the contrary by triggering
group identity with sufficient force to obliterate what could have otherwise been
a knock-down argument.
What we project outwardly is a worldview
that provides a mirror image of ourselves as individuals and as members of a
particular group. In other words, we are what we think and what we believe, and
therefore this is what we long to see. It’s how we learn to define worth, and it
explains why we feel threatened when others disagree with us. Indeed, the
current political rhetoric about values is really more about who we think we are than about the kind of
people we really are and what we truly care about.
Consequently, if we can't relate to our
political leaders, then we don't view them as being one of us, which makes them
certifiably illegitimate. This is why many liberals could never accept the
presidency of George W. Bush as being valid; it's also what fuels the birthers
and those who claim Barack Obama is un-American.
Still, my studies lead to me to conclude
that we Americans are not as viscerally divided as our media would have us
believe. When it comes to solving practical political problems, groups of neighbors—minus
professional politicians and media pundits—are often able to reach common
ground and compromise without much difficulty. We need to keep this in mind,
especially with regard to how we view media. Political news media maintain
audiences by treating hot-button issues like beach volleyballs, spiking the
ball as often as possible to keep us watching.
American history is very clear about the
characterization of how our nation was founded and by whom. Our founders were
intellectuals by any standard, and we cannot maintain a nation founded on
democratic principles without rising to the same caliber of thought. If we
value what our founders valued, we should aspire to an identity that says to be
an American is to put pettiness aside and abide by the better argument,
regardless of its source. But because of our political predispositions, a great
deal of conscious effort is required
to achieve the level of citizenship that our founders intended.
Hot-button issues aside, we the people should be a sufficient
measure of identity to engage American citizens in the business of acting
democratically. This could be accomplished if we refused to let media and
ambitious politicians use the existential angst that comes with the human
condition to divide us in order to further their own ends.
The election is over. It's time to examine
and reevaluate our values in light of the latest research about how our minds
really work. It's time to stop the nonsense and act like people who are truly
interested in achieving democracy.
My
Books and Essays on Amazon
Sing it out, Charles! thank you for this one...
ReplyDelete